24 November 2009

We are a way for the cosmos to know itself



From Symphony of Science - all of a sudden, Auto Tune is incredible (props to my cousin for the original link).

I have a few comments on this video. First, I love the chorus: "We are connected to... the rest of the universe, atomically." It makes science personal - this is our connection to stars and galaxies! The carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen that constitute human beings are the same elements that make up the largest structures in the universe. When your coach tells you to eat steak for the iron in it, it's the same iron that triggers a supernova.

And it isn't just the existence connection that's exciting; it's that the connection is miraculously on the smallest level! That's a big reason why I'm excited to be working on a particle accelerator - even physics on the smallest scale seeks to explain our place on the largest. The scientists in the video reflect this: Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson are astronomers, while Richard Feynman pioneered quantum electrodynamics - physics on the subatomic level. These are three of the greatest communicators of science in the modern era, and it's no coincidence that they come from opposite ends of scale.

Secondly, I love the way they speak about the universe. They treat it with an almost mystical reverence - "We are made of starstuff - We are a way for the cosmos to know itself" - it makes science exciting, a fundamental part of human endeavor and passion. "Nature's imagination... he is never going to let us relax." Nature as a living, breathing antagonist makes the quest for understanding seem so much more epic, more seductive, than nature (lowercase n) as a simple set of rules to solve.

Unfortunately, I have seen the way we talk about science in the public forum trend more and more toward dry, impersonal descriptions of algorithmic processes that lack any sense of wonder. "How do you do science? You test a hypothesis, and if it's wrong, you just check your assumptions." That is nearly a direct quotation from a thread in a forum I read once - how boring does that sound! Who would ever want to spend their life on something so formulaic, so lacking in creativity? I suppose on some level it's true, but statements like this really disguise the mystery and difficulty of forcing the universe to cough up its most closely-guarded secrets.

As an aside, it is my opinion that this decayed, insipidly stale portrayal of natural processes is in large part the result of the intelligent design debate. Intelligent design advocates are so intent on reinterpreting language, not facts, to support their theories that scientists have become afraid of anthropomorphizing Nature for fear of giving their opponents ammunition. "Evolution tries..." "The universe wants..." - these phrases are slowly being purged from our scientific vocabulary. Personally, I think science will survive all the better if we remember to keep it interesting and attractive to new people, and simply let pseudoscience wear itself out.

I know that the molecules in my body are traceable
To phenomena in the cosmos
That makes me want to grab people in the street
And say, have you heard this?

15 October 2009

No, really, the LHC might be under attack by particles from the future

The idea that the Higgs boson is traveling backwards in time to derail its own discovery has been featured lately in the New York Times, among other places, but it sounds like scientists are just making stuff up for why the LHC isn't working yet.

Here's an intelligible explanation that completely blew my mind.

12 October 2009

Interim Update

I have been pretty busy lately and at a loss for what to write, as will be explained below. My girlfriend visited recently, and we had a great time. She wrote a little about what we did here so feel free to go check out our trip to Vienna - my first trip outside Krakow that was not related to work!

Science-wise, I am super busy editing a report about the current work of the FCAL collaboration for a review committee. It has been my intention for some time to give a good explanation of the role of my particular detector, but I've refrained from doing this for two reasons. The first is that editing the report and reading the work of others, who work on detectors that perform similar or complimentary roles, has helped me gain a better understanding of how my detector fits into the big picture. The second reason is that LumiCal isn't a particularly glamorous detector - it won't be detecting new particles or extra dimensions. Instead it plays more of a "background" role, so trying to make it interesting and relevant to people is a bit of a challenge. I promise I'll give it my best shot.

21 August 2009

Soylent Green

Here's a scary thought: If the world human population continues to grow at 1.14% per year, then we only have about 3,000 years before the entire mass of the Earth is converted into people. Good news, though; there is hope! We could reduce birth rates or let war, disease, and famine level out the human population, OR we could colonize the solar system. I know which one sounds a lot cooler.

20 August 2009

Things that have happened to me in Poland while my camera has been out of batteries

1. The Tour de Pologne, a week-long road race through Poland, finished at the park a block away from my dorm. All the big teams were there, and it was really cool to be able to get right up next to the riders. I never realized that despite the fact that they ride for hours every day, the spectators only see them for about 20 seconds! Their open mouths and stooped shoulders really leave you wondering what the heck happens for the other 9 hours, 59 minutes and 40 seconds.

2. I went on another fantastic bike ride myself, to NiepoĊ‚omice.

3. A friend from college came passing through for a weekend, just in time for a pierogi festival!

4. I have determined to not give up on this blog.

This city is fantastic during the summer; there's always some sponsored event, and since I don't speak Polish that well, it's always a surprise!

22 July 2009

Thanks Jorge

Alright, I originally intended to post something about calorimetry in particle physics (which is what my project is about) but that post was getting way too complicated so I'll put it off until I think of a way to simplify it and actually make it worth reading.

In the meantime, the 40th anniversary of the first moon landing was just a couple days ago! Since lately I've focused on writing computer simulations of our calorimeter, you get a computer-y post today.

The Google Code Blog has posted some of the actual code from the Apollo 11 Lunar Landing Module and Command Module! I can't really read it, but the comments are fun. Here's my favorite:

TC BANKCALL # TEMPORARY, I HOPE HOPE HOPE
CADR STOPRATE # TEMPORARY, I HOPE HOPE HOPE


Secondly, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has pictures of the landing sites! Here's Apollo 14, and click the picture for a link to the others.

03 July 2009

Mom's here!

Hey everybody, sorry for the lack of updates but I had my first presentation over the weekend, and now my Mom's visiting! So it'll be at least a few days before I can write again. In the meantime, panic!